this post is about iron mountain, based on the film but also the book which I read, it is a short book by the way, these people are out of their gourd, literally.kind of a review/commentary.
it says in part “medical advances are viewed more as problems then as prgress,” really? poverty is necessary (and you thought the war on poverty was about eradicating poverty silly you)and desirable (to whom? the starving people?)”standing armies are social welfare institutions exactly the same sense as are old people’s homes and mental hospitals.” really? “Antimissle missiles and fallout shelters programs are understood to have the spending of vast sums of money not the advancement of science or national defense as their principle goals and military draft policies are only remotely concerned with defense.”
“he is not likely to take kindly to the notion of the deliberate intensification of air and water pollution (as part of a program leading to peace). the long range planning and budgeting of the optimum number of lives to be destroyed annually in overt warfare is high on the groups list of priotirites for gov action, (see what I mean out of their gourd) dont worry it gets even better. they are advocating murder.
“in the case of military “waste” there is indeed a larger social utility. it derives from teh fact that the wastefulness of war production is exercised entirely outside the framework of the economy of supply and demand.” “War and only war solves the problem of inventory.” war expenditure, “has provdied addtional protection against depressions” “war production is progressive because it is production that would not otherwise have taken place.” How is not making tanks, missles and bombs and destructive microbes a bad thing?
“the poltical funcitons of war have been up to now even more critical to social stability.” (really?) so what they are saying without war we would all just go stagnant and not progress socially, spritiually, economicially and technologically and we would all become a bunch of lawbreaking maniacs?
“without it (war or threat of it) no government has ever been able to obtain acquiescence (obedience) in it’s “legitimacy” or right to rule it’s society.the possibility of war provides the sense of extenral necessity without which no government can long remain in power.” now we get at the real reason for war until a substitute can be found, power, not prosperity for the people, not humanitarian purposes not enviromental issues, but perpetuation of their power without the destruction that war brings. a substitute that would allow government to keep a full grip on power of everyone and everything for thier own benefit.
“until it is developed (the substitution to war) the continuance of the war system must be assured if for no other reason among others than to preserve whatever quality and degree of poverty a society requires as an incentive as well as to maintain the stablity of its internal organization power.” poverty as a incentive? does anyone understand this part?
get this, “war as a general social release.” release of what? frustrations of the oppression they are under due to governmental abuses? keep them busy so they have no time or energy to stand up to evil? “war as a generational stabilizer.” controlled population via murder.
“war as a ideological clarifier.” this one I am not sure of. “war as the basis for international understanding.” this one I do get, if you dont comply with me I will blow your head off. do you notice how they use words to sugar coat very bad and evil ideas?
this one will make you cringe, “An economy as advanced and complex as our own requires the planned average annual destruction of not less than 10 percent of gross national product, if it is effectivly to fulfill it’s stablizing function.” really? stabilizing society by destroying wealth? are they kidding me, aer they saying in code that they must destroy a certain amount of wealth to prevent paying off of debts and loss of power to impose thier will on the population?
so in a nutshell they are saying that a true peace would lead to loss of power for the elites, loss of prestige, loss of control to impose thier ideas of utopia on people including accumulation of wealth in thier own hands, would lead to a decrease in poverty (remember they said poverty is necessary and desirable)increase prosperity for all, increase non war technological advances, enviromental acheivements that will solve the enviromental crisis without the need for the elites and that will actually solve the problem, increase in a healthy population, increase cooperation among people decreasing tensions between classes and races, and generally make freedom and happiness truly possible and that they will prove to be liars that they are? you see what I mean this world has a bunch of arrogant,ambitous, control freaks who only love themselves and their ideas (much of which is actually satanic propaganda programming)
by the way this explains the wastefulness of the green movement, all the gov subsides given to companies to make windmills and other green stuff (and some who also just take the money and run using their company as a shell) which many are now falling in disrepair, this is waste they talk about. these green inventions are more enviromentally destructive then using gas or oil. so this is prime example of what these nuts in suits are talking about.
do you see what I mean? out of their mind totally. this is only a small sample, if you can stomach it you can read the pdf file on the net, just type iron mountain report.